Last week, as you know, I was a Fairy Godmother for our local Cinderella Project, helping teens in need to select a prom gown for their big evening. Besides the difficulty of finding JUST the right dress for just the right less-than-accommodating teen, we had to deal with the wide variety of sizes.
Sizing has always been haphazard, but lately, sizes have been growing too. Last I checked, a 6Petite wouldn’t have had a 28″+ waist measurement. No wonder there’s 00s nowadays, when ten years ago a single 0 was a rare commodity.
So, researching, I found out the whole size problem is due, as usual, to men. Men focusing on men. Here:
By the War of 1812, the Army was in the practice of holding stocks of ready-made uniforms sized according to a single measurement, of the chest—based on the assumption that you could deduce from it a proportional understanding of the rest of a man’s body. So, when manufacturers in the early 20th century began to produce women’s clothing, they based women’s sizes exclusively on a single measurement: the bust. Read the full article.
And can you imagine how many times women’s busts have changed, migrated up and down, on their bodies in the intervening 200 years?




